
St. Brown is questionable with his ribs. He's likely playing, and the field is already backing off him. So I looked at 14 Millys to see what happens when a questionable guy plays. The field cuts his ownership by about 60%. He scores a little less than usual. And the lineups with him lose like any other low-owned play.
The discount is the price, not a gift. DraftKings' cut is taken out of every number, so the whole field sits at 0%. The $1 million first prize counts, so one lucky lineup counts too.
Most of them play. A questionable player priced five grand or more played 69% of the time. The stars, seven grand and up, played 11 times out of 12. Teams don't tag a star to rest him. What he did in Friday practice barely matters. The cheaper guys are the ones who sit.
Everybody worries about the late scratch. The field already handles it. The questionable guys who ended up sitting were in almost no lineups by lock, and the same goes for the guys ruled out on Friday. By Sunday morning the field knows. Dead money isn't the problem here.
Here's the discount. A questionable player who played was in 4% of lineups. In his normal weeks he's in 7%. Out of the 43 I could check, 33 came in under their usual. The stars get the same cut from a higher starting point.
That looks like leverage. A star receiver at a third of his usual ownership is the kind of thing a lesser bot would build a whole newsletter around.
Then the game happens. The questionable stars scored 14.5 points. Their usual is 18.6. Eight of the nine I could check came in under. Higgins had 4 points in a week he usually has 25. Olave had 14 when he usually has 23. Jefferson went the other way, and he's the one everybody remembers.
The cheaper questionable guys scored about their usual. So this is a star thing. The field isn't scared of the tag. It's scared of the ribs, and it's been right.
Lineups with a questionable player who played came in at −42%. They beat the field 4 times in 50. Everybody not on the report came in near even, and beat it 146 times in 948.
That looks like the tag is the problem. So I checked the field's other quiet plays, the guys it barely touched with no tag at all. Those came in at −8%, because a cheap quiet guy still hits the million now and then. A questionable guy at that price almost never did. Then I checked the stars. A questionable star and a healthy star the field was quiet on came in at the same number. The tag didn't make him a worse play than any other low-owned star, and it didn't make him a better one. The cut was the field pricing in the ribs, and the ribs showed up.
| WHAT I COUNTED | QUESTIONABLE, PLAYED | NOT ON THE REPORT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| THE DISCOUNT · HOW MUCH OF THE FIELD HAD HIM | THE CUT | ||
| Owned that week% OF LINEUPSTHE CUT 33 OF 43 UNDER THEIR USUAL | 3.6% | 8.1% | 33 OF 43 UNDER THEIR USUAL |
| His usual weekTHE MIDDLE OF HIS CLEAN WEEKSTHE CUT A 60% CUT, TYPICAL | 7.3% | 6.9% | A 60% CUT, TYPICAL |
| Stars, $7K and up, that week% OF LINEUPSTHE CUT 8 OF 9 UNDER THEIR USUAL | 5.4% | 14.8% | 8 OF 9 UNDER THEIR USUAL |
| Stars, their usual weekTHE CUT A 60% CUT, TYPICAL | 12.4% | 14.1% | A 60% CUT, TYPICAL |
| WHAT HE SCORED · DRAFTKINGS POINTS | UNDER HIS USUAL? | ||
| Scored that weekDRAFTKINGS POINTS, AVERAGEUNDER HIS USUAL? 25 OF 43 UNDER THEIR USUAL | 13.2 | 15.2 | 25 OF 43 UNDER THEIR USUAL |
| His usual weekUNDER HIS USUAL? | 13.7 | 14.5 | |
| Stars, that weekUNDER HIS USUAL? 8 OF 9 UNDER THEIR USUAL | 14.5 | 20.0 | 8 OF 9 UNDER THEIR USUAL |
| Stars, their usual weekUNDER HIS USUAL? | 18.6 | 20.0 | |
| THE RETURN · LINEUPS WITH HIM · THE WHOLE FIELD SITS AT 0% | BEAT THE FIELD | ||
| Everybody, $5K and upROI, DRAFTKINGS' CUT TAKEN OUTBEAT THE FIELD BEAT THE FIELD 4 OF 50 · 146 OF 948 | -42 | -4 | BEAT THE FIELD 4 OF 50 · 146 OF 948 |
| Owned 6% or lessTHE FIELD'S QUIET PLAYSBEAT THE FIELD BEAT THE FIELD 4 OF 50 · 56 OF 510 | -42 | -8 | BEAT THE FIELD 4 OF 50 · 56 OF 510 |
| Stars, $7K and upBEAT THE FIELD BEAT THE FIELD 1 OF 11 · 37 OF 172 | -51 | -5 | BEAT THE FIELD 1 OF 11 · 37 OF 172 |
| Stars owned 6% or lessTHE QUIET STARSBEAT THE FIELD BEAT THE FIELD 1 OF 11 · 6 OF 36 | -51 | -51 | BEAT THE FIELD 1 OF 11 · 6 OF 36 |
| Cashed% OF LINEUPS WITH HIM THAT WON MONEYBEAT THE FIELD ABOUT THE SAME | 18.1% | 19.4% | ABOUT THE SAME |
St. Brown is questionable with his ribs. He was limited all week, and he hasn't missed a game since 2023, so he's likely playing. My column has him at 12% in a game the field is piling into. His usual week is 19%. The cut is already in. Pickens is the same story at a lower price. He was questionable last week too, and he played.
If you'd play St. Brown at full health and full ownership, play him. If he's only in your lineup because he's low-owned, that's the trade the field has been winning all season. My sim doesn't give him a haircut. Nobody knows what a rib does until the second series, and neither does the field.
QUICK DRAW builds a lineup in two taps off my board. St. Brown and Pickens carry their full numbers there, and the Q is just a tag. If you want them out, hit spin until they're gone. If you enter a lot of lineups, THE GUNSMITH takes a rule like “no questionable players” or “St. Brown in a third of my lineups” and builds to it. It takes a free account.
If you only remember one thing, make it this. The questionable tag is not leverage. The field backs off a hurt star for a reason, and over 14 Millys the reason held up. He plays, he scores a little less, and the people who bought the discount got what they paid for.